The FWB65

I bought this Model 65 four years ago. I paid £250, which is a typical price for an example in good condition. Looking at the serial number and design, it appears that it was probably made in 1973.

A quick look into the breech showed a brittle, perished seal; probably the original. The pistol shot well, but fearing for the condition of the piston buffer inside, I sent it off to a specialist in the UK for servicing. It came back four weeks later feeling tight and shooting like a pistol fresh from the factory. It still shoots that way today - not bad for a 40 year old air pistol.

Before owning this, the only other target pistol I had used was a Czech TAU 7. That was well made and extremely accurate when shot from a bench, but try as I might I couldn't shoot it off-hand. I could barely even hold it steady on target, and I began to lose heart in pistol shooting. My confidence was restored on handling the Model 65; the grip size, shape, and angle suit me much better, as does the balance. As a result, while I'll never be competitive, I can pull off the occasional good bit of shooting. The Model 65 was available with a variety of grips, from plastic sporter types to the adjustable type seen here, in a range of sizes. I think this has a medium grip, but I am unsure; it is stamped "H" on the base.

As with Feinwerkbau's target air rifles, the 65 has a sidelever-cocking action mounted on sliding rails to absorb recoil. Early pistols were fitted with two springs, counter-wound, in order to eliminate the twisting recoil that can sometimes be felt in airguns. I believe this was dropped later, and a single spring was used. The photograph above shows the sidelever latch. You can also see the new breech seal, and beneath that a new damper, the small white plastic protrusion. To cock the pistol, the sidelever must be pulled back quite far, which can be hard for those with weaker hands. It is secured in this stroke by a ratchet, to prevent the breech closing on your fingers while loading. When the breech is closed again, the damper pushes against a catch, unlocking the trigger mechanism (I think, although I stand to be corrected - mechanics are not my strong point).

The front sight element is interchangeable, with a variety of widths available. Simply loosen the screw above the muzzle and slip out the element. Some pistols are fitted with a barrel sleeve which adds weight to the front and alters the point of balance. This one is not, and I am happy with the balance is it is. On the later Model 80, the sleeve was replaced by three weights that could be fitted under the barrel.

The rear sight is adjustable for width, as well as windage and elevation. Early pistols had a more basic sight, with replaceable elements, while that fitted to later pistols was wider. The sight picture is excellent, but if I were a competitive shooter I think I would appreciate the wider rear sight of a later pistol. Another difference between this and later examples is the distance that the frame, or tang, extends back over the shooter's hand; it extends a little further back on later pistols. These variations, and others, are discussed in detail on the American Vintage Airguns forum here.

The trigger blade is wide and comfortable. A groove is cut across the face, which helps to align the finger consistently. It is adjustable for both weight of pull and travel, but the blade cannot be adjusted for angle. The pistol is relatively easy to hold on target, and the trigger is excellent; no excuses for missing the bull. Although the Model 65 uses the same recoil-absorbing mechanism as the 150/300 series rifles, the shot is not completely devoid of "feel"; trigger control and follow-through must be perfect, and poor technique will still show up on the target.

In addition to the normal trigger adjustments, there is another. By pushing this switch on the underside of the receiver forward or back, the trigger weight can be varied from 500g (the minimum permissible for 10 metre match) to 1360g (for use in training for centrefire pistol matches). The recoil-absorbing sledge can also be locked by screwing a small plate into the hole in the receiver just below the barrel.

The FWB65 is an accurate, superbly engineered air pistol. It is robust, and with basic maintenance will last more than a lifetime. It was arguably the best air pistol of its day, and even today I would take one over any other spring powered pistol. While more modern PCPs give a small edge to the very best competition shooters, I think the Model 65 is still capable of impressing most.

 

The FWB127 Sport

I have been working away from most of my collection for the past year, but for the next couple of weeks I'm back at the old house and can play with them.

 

 According to D R Hughes, who imported Feinwerkbau guns into the UK in the 1970s, the Sport was first released onto the US market in late 1973, and arrived in Britain around the summer of 1975. It was manufactured until 1989. The basic variations familiar to British shooters are the 124 (in .177/4.5mm calibre) and the 127 (.22/5.5mm). There are several other variants in existence, including the 121, fitted with a more basic stock, but they are less common, at least in the UK. I first read about the Sport on AirgunBBS, and was immediately interested. A light, quick handling, accurate and simple sporter, made to a standard rarely seen on sporting airguns - what's not to like?

Well, quite a few things, it seems. The more I read, the more little quirks seemed to come out about this rifle. Talk of spongy triggers, failing safety catches, fragile stocks, weak barrel lock-ups, harsh recoil and hold-sensitivity put me off buying one for several years. Why put up with such failings when a HW35 or 95 does the same job with a Rekord trigger and no issues? I asked on the forum, and the resulting discussion laid to rest some of the negative impressions I had gained, but more importantly highlighted just how great a rifle many people consider the Sport to be, despite its faults. I resolved to have a Sport of my own, but it was three years before one came up at a price I could afford: the slightly battered example you see in these photographs. On receiving the rifle, I immediately saw why it is held in such high regard. It comes to the shoulder easily and balances perfectly. Despite worn bluing, a cracked stock and a few knocks to the metalwork, a high standard of workmanship is evident. A nice touch, which I am disappointed to see has been omitted from the new version, is the sling swivel fitted to the breech block. As a Model 127, this is in .22/5.5mm calibre.

My rifle lacks its original open sights, so I fitted a Nikko Stirling Platinum 4x32 scope. A bigger scope might aid accuracy, but I wanted to keep the weight down and preserve the elegant lines. I think the scope dates from the mid-1990s, so it's not contemporary to the rifle (this one was made in 1979) but I think it suits it well. I chose a Sportsmatch OP22C one piece mount, which includes a horizontal pin which fits into the grooves atop the cylinder in order to prevent the mount from shifting back under recoil. Some people don't like this system, as there is potential for the pin to dig into the cylinder and cause damage, but I have taken the risk and all seems well so far. The photograph below shows the underside of the mount, with the cross-pin (fitted to a different scope).

 

Cocking effort is light, and this ease of use is one of the factors that makes it such a joy to shoot. The breech is secured by a ball-bearing and pin/nipple arrangement, which seems solid enough on mine but has come in for criticism by other owners. It seems that in time the pin or nipple on the front of the cylinder can wear down, resulting in a weak lock-up. I have greased mine, perhaps a little too much, to prevent this wear.

On cocking, an automatic safety catch is activated. It is positioned at the back of the cylinder, where my thumb falls naturally. One should never rely on a safety catch, and this goes for that fitted to my Sport more than any gun I've owned - this one does not work. I suspect it is due to a worn part, and it is a very common problem. Fortunately the trigger is reliable, and is unaffected by the defective safety catch.

The trigger is best described as adequate for a sporter. It is not in the same class as a Rekord, but it is not bad. Being a Sport Mk.I, my rifle is fitted with a plastic trigger blade, but I believe this was changed to aluminium on the Mks.II and III. Many owners have also fitted after-market metal trigger blades to their Mk.Is. There is a limited amount of adjustment, but I have left mine alone. Pull on this is about 1kg. It is possible to modify for a more precise two stage release, according to this post on AirgunBBS.

Recoil is noticeable but not excessive. I am used to the recoilless FWB300S so have been spoilt a little, but the Sport is not too bad for a light, full powered (12ft.lbs/16J UK legal limit) rifle. There is some vibration, but again, this is not excessive and I suspect anyone who knows a little about tuning could eliminate it.

I shot this target recently. The group measures 13mm centre to centre, and although 20 metres is not really far enough to show true accuracy, I have no doubt that with care the same could be achieved at 30 metres (maybe with different pellets; while great at close range, flat-headed RWS Hobby tend to spread past 20-25 metres). Although an all-out sporter, the Feinwerkbau Sport does have some competition heritage: the first Field Target competition in the UK was won by a shooter using a 127.

A frequent problem with the Sport is cracked stocks. As you can see, mine has a crack running from behind the trigger guard across the pistol grip. This has been repaired and feels solid, so I am not worried by it. A common fix is to remove the grip cap and insert a bolt through the base of the grip, making it stronger than ever.

 

Another issue is that over time the rubber butt pads deteriorate. I will replace mine, as it does not provide any grip on my shoulder.

It may seem that this article is full of negatives: faulty this, worn out that. It is true that the Sport is not a perfect rifle, and mine is far from a good example, but I must emphasise this: it is much more than the sum of its parts. Handling and shooting it are a simple pleasure. If my limited experience does not convince, read this article by Richard Welham, a competitive shooter who was involved in tuning Sports in the 1980s. Mine is a keeper, one I will never sell.

As always, comments and corrections are welcome.